Showing posts with label family courts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label family courts. Show all posts

Monday, July 5, 2010

It's Pretty Sad When Your Own Lawyer Screws You (Literally)


UPDATE (7/15/10): William Wallace drops out of race for Gibson County Prosecutor.


William Wallace, a family law attorney in Evansville, and currently a candidate for Gibson County Prosecutor, is a dirty, dirty guy. He'll probably get elected because he'll fit right in...


From the Indiana Law Blog:

William Wallace, a local attorney and the Democratic Party's candidate for Gibson County prosecutor in November's election, was indicted Tuesday for allegedly having videotaped sex with a former client to pay off a $550 debt to him for work he did in a civil case.

The woman said on at least one other occasion, Wallace offered to have sex with her and pay her for it because he knew she was having financial issues and needed the money.

Special Prosecutor Jonathan Parkhurst said Tuesday that the Gibson County grand jury heard from eight witnesses before deciding that Wallace should be charged.

He faces four charges that include obstruction of justice and possession of child pornography, both class D felonies; patronizing a prostitute, a class A misdemeanor; and false informing, a class B misdemeanor.

A class D felony carries a term of six months to three years; a class A misdemeanor is from no time to a year; and a class B misdemeanor is no time to 180 days.

Wallace was ordered by Gibson Superior Court Judge Earl Penrod to turn himself in to the county jail Tuesday evening and pay at least $500 of a $750 cash bond.

The attorney, who has worked in both Gibson and Vanderburgh counties, has been in practice since 1989 and is a former public defender for the Vanderburgh County Public Defenders Agency. He also has been an adjunct professor at Oakland City University and serves on a number of boards in the community.

Sunday, June 20, 2010

Lethal Trinity of Hoodlums: Fatherhood, Motherhood, White-hooded White Men in the American Midwest

I got my "Happy Father's Day" email this morning from Senator Evan Bayh. He forgot about, or decided to ignore, Mother's Day again. From Let's Get Honest:


Lethal Trinity of Hoodlums: Fatherhood, Motherhood, White-hooded White Men in the American MidWest

Custodial Dads & Stepmoms, Divorcing Dads, and Absent Moms… Not good for kids.

I’ve been thinking about this one for a while. I’m going to pick on Indiana, as it has a prominent Fatherhood promoter in legislator Evan Bayh, and recent trouble with another Dad that won custody, 5 year old girl died, and he and STEPMOM tried to blame it (unsuccessfully) on the REAL (biological) mother, who is now down a child, just months after losing custody of (her).

In this one, the mandated reporters who had a chance to, DIDN’T, and the first who did report, just went along with blaming the real Mom.

New details emerge in death of 5-year-old girl at hands of custodial dad, step mom

(Muncie, Indiana)

The general public still thinks that mothers don’t lose custody unless they’re nuts or sluts. But this article tells you the truth: the protective mother lost custody because she COULD NOT AFFORD AN ATTORNEY. She was outgunned by a lawyered-up Daddy who could buy what he wanted. Which was basically a 5-year-old girl he could rape, torture, and systematically starve. Everybody happy now? In addition to CPS getting dragged through the wringer (again), are we going to see the names of the custody evaluators, judges, and other court officials who rubberstamped this custody arrangement? Don’t hold your breath. Even if a few CPS or medical workers get reprimanded or lose their jobs, the court people will stay golden. One of the few exceptions is Judge Robert Lemkau who got voted out of office after he gave a crazy violent father visitation of an infant, an infant who was murdered less than two weeks later. The public has got to start holding the courts responsible for these gross miscarriages of justice.

http://www.fox59.com/news/wxin-muncie-death-investigation-update-061610,0,871744.story

New details emerge in death of Muncie 5-year-old
During a six-month period last fall and winter, more than a half dozen health care workers treated or observed serious problems with five year-old Lauren McConniel. It wasn’t until about a week before she died on March 9th from severe malnutrition, that her injuries were reported to . . .

Another century, and …..

Here’s MOTHERHOOD WORSHIP with the HOODED WHITE GUYS, same state (and supported by religious women, also….)

  • Lies Across America: What Our Historic Sites Get Wrong – Google Books Result

    James W. Loewen – 2007 – History – 464 pages
    The Indiana Klan stressed law enforcement, motherhood, virtue, patriotism, In that year’s Democratic National Convention, the Ku Klux
  • (This is accessible to view by Googlebooks and shows that a large resurgence of this clan, pre-civil rights of the 1960s, happened in INDIANA. It’s worth a read. They had got the press, the governor, and were aiming for U.S. President, as I recall, and they emphasized MOTHERHOOD. How ironic, the pendulum has swung the otherway; same state (and possibly same practices), now it’s “Fatherhood.” In Indiana and, thanks to the internet and increasing centralization in the U.S., and a less and less diverse U.S. Congress (it’s EXPENSIVE to get elected), nationwide.

    I’m going to digress here, because the link to the “less and less diverse” article pictures Roland Burris, well-known in FATHERHOOD circles:

    Senate likely to be less diverse after elections

    By Deanna Bellandi, Associated Press Writer Fri Feb 5

    CHICAGO – That historically all-white club known as the U.S. Senate is likely to lose what little diversity it has after November’s elections.

    Two white men will be competing for President Barack Obama’s former seat in Illinois, now held by Roland Burris, the chamber’s lone African-American. Appointed by the scandal-tainted former governor, Burris won’t be seeking a full term.

    In contests in Florida, Texas and North Carolina, black candidates face daunting challenges to joining the august body, from difficulty raising cash to lack of name recognition to formidable rivals.

    Blacks comprise 12.2 percent of the nation’s population, but you wouldn’t know it in the 100-member Senate. Come next year, the total number could add up to zero.

    “It certainly is not a desirable state of affairs,” said David Bositis, a senior political analyst with the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies.

    Bositis noted that blacks don’t make up the majority population in any state and in states where there are large numbers of blacks, as in the South, there are racial divisions that make getting elected difficult.

    Florida is more likely to produce the next Hispanic senator than it is the next black senator…

    Notice that this article is only talking about the ‘diversity’ of skin color, not the ‘diversity’ of political thought.

    In truth, if the Republicans take away more seats from the Democrat super-majority, the Congress will be certainly be more diverse.

    But of course in the minds of the Associated Press, the color of one’s skin is far more important than the content of their character.

    {{Guess that was not a pro-Burriss based on his politics site. However, he’s no less “fatherhood” than white guys….}}

    Here’s to “Roland Burris fatherhood” google search:

  • U.S. Senator Roland Burris to Appear on a Special Father’s Day

    US Senator Roland Burris to Appear on a Special Father’s Day Edition of Chicago Attorney Jeffery Leving’s ‘Fathers’ Rights Legal Show’ on June 20th.
    www.prnewswire.com/…/us-senator-roland-burris-to-appear-on-a-special-fathers-day-edition-of-chicago-attorney-jeffery-levings-fathers-right…Cached
  • Attorney Jeffery Leving to Interview U.S. Senator Roland Burris on

    United States Senator Roland Burris (D-IL) will join Mr. Leving on his “Fathers’ Rights Obama’s proposed $500 million budget for Responsible
  • Fathers Rights: Jeffery M Leving-Leading Family Law & Divorce

    U.S. Senator Roland Burris to Appear on(etc., etc.)
    NOW, this is back about a CENTURY (almost) and talking about another kind of HOODlum (Pictured below, and self-described on the infamous site, below). Look at how it was sold — temperance, and motherhood.

    20thcentury

    This exact figure was found in the book, “Inside Ku Klux Klan” by Paul Gillette ….. Women of the Klan in many Indiana counties met with township trustees to While girls were learning the virtues and tasks of motherhood and moral …. This meant stressing the virtues of Christian fundamentalism and temperance. …
    www.kkklan.com/various.htm
    God,” I hate to quote this, or even VISIT this site – but notice — described (in this “KKK” site) as historically just nice, law-abiding, religious folk contributing to charitable, children’s oriented, and church/school folks. And that’s men & women BOTH…..

    The following was taken from, “Hoods: The Story of the Ku Klux Klan”, by Robert Ingalls.

    In Portland, Or., in the early 1920′s, the Ku Klux Klan pledged $50,000 to a children’s home and held a Christmas party featuring Kris Kringle. The Klan also organized a Klan Kommunity Kit to compete with the Community Chest, church visits became a kind of ritual. Typically, a small group of Klansmen would march down the aisle, hand the minister an offering of money, and silently depart. (page 39)

    Protestant ministers quickly found that the Klan’s emphasis on religion helped swell church attendance. (page 41)

    Similarly, the emphasis on DOMINATING women and keeping them in their “proper” roles is helping swell church tithes to this day, 2010….

    Most Klansmen were law abiding, church going family men. Klansmen also hoped to eliminate vice and corruption through the ballot box. One Klansman declared, “Everybody knows that politicians nowadays cater to all kinds of elements, mostly selfish, some corrupt, and some definitely anti-American. They cater to the vice vote and even to the violently criminal vote. What the Klan intends to do is make them pay some attention to the decent God fearing, law abiding vote.” (pages 42-43)

    wpe20615.gif  (130773 bytes) Mr. Smith goes to Washington.

    During the 1920′s, the Klan was subjected not only to verbal abuse but also to physical assault in some areas. Bootleggers, for example, did not take kindly to the Klan’s attempts to enforce prohibition. When New Jersey’s Klan declared war on local bootleggers, the rum runners formed a defense council and publicly threatened to “Shoot to kill” anyone other then a policeman who interfered with their illegal traffic in liquor. (page 68)

    The following was taken from, “Hooded Americanism, the History of the Ku Klux Klan”, by David M. Chalmers.

    In Minneapolis, the Klan presented bibles to Methodist Churches and stressed “positive Protestantism”. (page 151)

    In Indiana the Klan gathered contributions to build a new hospital. (page 165

    NOW FATHERHOOD:

    =========

    We (see blogroll to right) have blogged on this before. See Wikipedia for Son (Evan) and Father (Birch):

    Evan Bayh – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • Birch Evans “EvanBayh III (pronounced /ˈbaɪ/, bye; born December 26, 1955) is an American Democratic politician who has served as the junior U.S. Senator
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Bayh17 hours agoCachedSimilar
  • Birch Bayh – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Children, Evan Bayh (born 1955), Christopher Bayh (born 1982) He is the father of former Indiana governor and current U.S. Senator Evan Bayh.
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birch_BayhCachedSimilar
  • And see “MamaLiberty”‘s Sept. 2009 weblog for commentary on this:

    rotten-apple-thumb11

    http://justice4mothers.wordpress.com/2009/08/30/fatherhood-initiative-bill-senator-evan-bayh-d-in-is-not-his-fathers-son/

    This is from the Indiana Mothers For Custodial Justice, covering the recently introduced Fatherhood Initiative Bill:

    Evan Bayh is Not His Father’s Son

    I heard this comment in a meeting yesterday, and how true it is. ” Evan Bayh is not his father’s son.”

    In Birch Bayh’s eyes, women should be given the same chances that men have. Women deserved equality and this was evident in his legislation.

    ‘Father’ Of Title IX Honored

    By Richard Veilleux

    Former U.S. Sen. Birch Bayh of Indiana, considered the “father” of Title IX, the landmark federal legislation created more than 30 years ago that greatly expanded educational and athletics opportunities for girls and women, was honored during half-time of the women’s basketball game between UConn and Rutgers on Martin Luther King Day.

    . . .

    Sen. Bayh also played a leadership role in many other areas and in framing two Constitutional amendments: the 26th Amendment, which lowered the legal voting age to 18, and the Equal Rights Amendment, a proposed Constitutional amendment guaranteeing equal rights to women, which has been ratified by 35 states, including Connecticut.

    AND, now, the son….

    na in the U.S. Senate from 1963 to 1981.But for Evan Bayh, the apple has fallen far from the tree…he supports fatherhood (not parenthood)…this being sent out in preparation of the reintroduction of a Fatherhood Initiative Bill into the U.S. Senate:

    Senator Bayh sent out this wonderful message for fathers on Father’s Day to the Hoosiers he represents. He missed sending out a message for mothers…tells you a lot, doesn’t it. He is up for re-election next year….Hoosiers mothers, are you paying attention?

    Watch out for these bill just introduced: S. 1309, introduced by Sen. Evan Bayh, (D-IN) and two co-sponsors.H.R. 2979, introduced by Rep. Danny K. Davis (IL-7) and 27 co-sponsors.President Obama told Senator Bayh last year he would sign the bill when he gets it.

    The 2006 attempt at this bill (with U.S. Senator Barack Obama as one of the two co-sponsors) died:

    The list below shows legislation in this and previous sessions of Congress that had the same title as this bill. Often bills are incorporated into other omnibus bills, and you may be able to track the status of provisions of this bill by looking for an omnibus bill below. Note that bills may have multiple titles.

    This one needs to die too.


    Is it fair for our government tax dollars to go help take children from mothers, to help fund a custody battle in court (among other ‘fatherly’ support things), help that is only available to fathers? These funds pay for dads to do this. All dads are not good (see Dastardly Dads).

    Abusive custodial fathers are constantly in the news, such as today [SEPT. 2009] : New Mexico Custodial Father Murdered Allegedly By 10 Year Old Son Who Couldn’t Take Anymore Abuse and Jon Pomeroy, Father of Seattle-area Girl, Pleads Guilty to Starving Her. Why should we help abusers take children from their moms? The American Judge’s Association knows this is a problem, why do you want to fund abusers to take custody of the children?

    Yes, Evan, your dad took time to be with you. He didn’t seek to take your mother out of your life though, did he? Yes, this apple has fallen very far from the tree.

    Birch_Tree11


    Friday, May 7, 2010

    Battered Mothers to Hold Vigil at the White House on Mother's Day

    No thanks to the civil (?) court judges that give child custody to abusers, and cut mothers out of the children's lives....don't you think the children know what is going on already? Don't you know they often witness when a parent beats the crap out of the other parent, over and over again?

    By Mary Darcy

    WeNews correspondent

    Friday, May 7, 2010

    Battered mothers often shy away from publicity. But this year, in a sign of their growing organization, some plan to spend Mother's Day in Washington in a White House vigil to draw attention to a court system that often gives custody to abusers.

    (WOMENSENEWS)--On Mother's Day, busloads of battered moms and advocates for abused children will roll into Washington, D.C.

    They'll hold a vigil outside the White House in an effort to persuade President Obama to take up their cause of reforming a family court system that they say all too often puts children into the hands of abusive parents.

    For some it marks a new and somewhat frightening degree of public exposure. Some of the protesters will be shrouded in scarves, hiding from their abusers or a court system they fear will punish them for speaking out.

    "They're whistleblowers," said vigil organizer Connie Valentine, policy director for The California Protective Custody Association, based in Sacramento. "The system doesn't look kindly on whistleblowers. It's a difficult situation because we have seen enormous judicial retaliation against mothers who step up in front of the problem."

    Efforts to quantify the problem are just beginning but protective parents claim it is widespread. A study done by the Williamsburg, Va.-based American Judges Foundation in the early 1990s showed that in 70 percent of challenged cases, battering parents involved in custody battles persuaded authorities the victimized parent was unfit for sole custody, according to a spokesperson from the foundation.

    Valentine and other advocates for protective parents call the family courts broken and corrupt and say the system not only puts children into the hands of abusive parents, it also bankrupts and punishes the protective parents who fight for them. At the same time, they say it's hard to reform the system because the people it hurts are hiding from abusers and anxious to avoid publicity.

    Shifting Ground

    But Valentine feels the ground shifting. "I think we're in the early stages of a civil rights movement for protecting children from physical and sexual abuse."

    She said the Internet is helping battered mothers come together. "E-mail has helped. It's a good part of the reason for all of the advocacy," Valentine said. "Women are beginning to see that it's not their fault and that they are just pawns in the game."

    Mo Hannah, psychology professor at Siena College, near Albany, N.Y., used the Internet to organize the first annual conference for battered women seeking custody in 2004, after her own difficult custody battle.

    This past January marked the seventh gathering, which meets annually in Albany and is the major organizing and networking event of the year for protective parents.

    "The first conference was about getting people to talk and validate their experiences," Hannah said. "But as the conferences continued it became very clear that we needed a national movement. Now the conference is just sort of an umbrella or structure that encourages people to share with each other."

    Over the seven years, women have met at the conference and formed smaller groups, such as the Massachusetts Protective Mothers for Custodial Justice.

    "Mass Moms," as it has come to be known, brings together women who have gone through custody battles with those currently in the throes. Volunteers accompany women to court and on lawyer visits and play a general shepherding role.

    "We stand next to a woman who is fighting for her children while she pleads and receives orders," one Mass Mom told Women's eNews at January's Battered Mothers Custody Conference.

    These volunteers have all been through their own custody battles and declined to be named for fear of retribution from their ex-husbands or the court system. Many have gag orders associated with their own cases. It is this type of fear of retribution that has helped keep the protective parents movement under the radar.

    Fear Stands in the Way

    The California Protective Custody Association's Valentine understands the fear that keeps women from protesting and fighting the bigger battles.

    "I waited until my own children were grown so we weren't affected by the family court system," she said.

    Valentine says advocates and organizers need to study and replicate the successful civil rights campaigns of the past.

    "Slavery was ended with a good law but slavery wasn't ended because a good law happened to come about. The law happened because huge masses of people put their lives on the line and fought for it," Valentine said.

    This year "Mass Moms" is preparing to add some more public activism to their advocacy with a demonstration taking place in Boston on a date to be announced soon. In what they're planning to call "Confetti," the moms will symbolically shred court-appointed guardian reports--which they feel are particularly unfair to protective parents--into little bits and toss them at the statehouse to call attention to the plight of protective mothers fighting for custody of their children.

    In New York City, a group called V.O.W., or Voices of Women, has been working within the court system to try to provide legal counsel and one-on-one help for women. On a wider scale its mission is to "promote long-term systemic change by documenting institutional failures, testifying at hearings, creating position papers and meeting with local and state officials."

    Both Valentine and Hannah say this is the right time to take the movement to the next level.

    "The new president is a fatherless man with a good wife and they will hear us," said Valentine. "And if they don't hear us, Vice President Joe Biden worked on the violence against women act and he will hear us. And if they don't hear us we will keep going until they do hear us."

    Mary Darcy is a multimedia producer/host and documentary filmmaker. She's a two time Gracie Award winner for her work with Kate Mulgrew on Herstory and The Sounds of Progress, public radio series about great women in science. Darcy is a co-owner in Uptown/Downtown Media, producers of Alloveralbany.com.

    For more information:

    Battered Mothers Custody Conference
    http://www.batteredmotherscustodyconference.org/

    Battered Mothers Custody Conference California Protective Parents Association http://www.protectiveparents.com/research.html

    Saturday, February 13, 2010

    Family Courts Implicated in Infant's Murders

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE February 10, 2010

    Contacts: Rita Smith, NCADV 303-839-1852 ext. 105

    Kathleen Russell, CJE 415-250-1180

    Family Courts Implicated in Infants’ Murders

    Two Young Boys Killed by Two Divorcing Dads in Past 10 Days

    Points to Massive System Failure

    SAN RAFAEL- National and local advocacy groups are expressing outrage over what has become a disturbing national trend of divorcing Dads killing their children and themselves.

    8-month-old baby Bekm was shot and killed by his father, Nicholas Bacon, in Meridian, Idaho just 48 hours ago, while 9-month-old baby Wyatt was killed by his father Stephen Garcia just ten days ago in San Bernardino County. Details are still emerging about the tragic Idaho murder-suicide of baby Bekm on Monday night.

    In the Garcia case, three different judges refused multiple requests by the child’s mother for restraining orders to protect her child, despite police reports and documented death threats by the father in text messages and on Facebook.

    “The system failed Wyatt Garcia and Katie Tagle,’’ said California Assemblymember Jim Beall, Jr., the lead sponsor of Assembly Bill 612, which aims to prevent the use of non-scientific theories in California family courts. “Wyatt’s tragic death was completely avoidable.”

    http://www.leadershipcouncil.org/

    Numerous sources report a significant spike in murder suicides across the country by violent fathers who kill their children and themselves, frequently after mothers’ requests for protection of their children are denied by family court judges. In addition, the Leadership Council on Child Abuse & Interpersonal Violence estimates that more than 58,000 children per year in America are ordered by family courts into unsupervised contact with physically or sexually abusive parents following divorce.

    “The time has come for us as a society to speak out and put a stop to this growing national body count. Across the country, women and children are being killed because of judges’ personal biases and junk science that tells them to disbelieve women’s legitimate claims and evidence of abuse,” said Rita Smith, the Executive Director of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence.

    According to court transcripts and eyewitness accounts, judges reacted with disbelief when mother Katie Tagle presented them with evidence of death threats against her son by the father.

    Judge David Mazurek stated, “I get concerned when there’s a pending child custody and visitation issue and in between that, one party or the other claims that there’s some violence in between. It raises the court’s eyebrows because based on my experience, it’s a way for one party to try to gain an advantage over the other,” he said.

    http://www.centerforjudicialexcellence.org/

    “This attitude permeates the courts, that women are lying about the danger they are in,” said Kathleen Russell from the Center for Judicial Excellence. “This attitude causes judges to ignore tangible evidence of death threats and abuse. The abusers’ lobby has convinced judges that shared custody is always the answer, and sadly, this case points out how deadly that approach can be,” she said.

    According to a family member who was in the courtroom when Ms. Tagle last sought protection for her son, the judge reportedly said, “One of you is lying, and I think it’s you,” while pointing at Katie. Transcripts from this hearing are not yet available.

    The National Coalition Against Domestic Violence and the Center for Judicial Excellence are part of a growing national advocacy movement to educate the public as well as litigants, lawmakers, judges, and social service providers about the need for comprehensive family court reform. The Center for Judicial Excellence and their allies worked with California State Senator Mark Leno and others to pass an audit request through the state legislature last July. The California State Auditor is currently investigating the use of court appointees in family courts because of growing evidence that children are being harmed there. The California Legislature is slated to consider additional family court reform bills being presented by the Center and the California Protective Parents Association in the coming months.

    “We must assess what’s happening in our family courts, and that’s why I’ve requested a state audit to take a hard look at the performance and effectiveness of the family court system,’’ said Assemblymember Beall.

    The State Auditor’s report about the California Family Courts has an expected release date of June 2010.

    ***************

    http://www.ncadv.org/

    NCADV – The Mission of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV) is to organize for collective power by advancing transformative work, thinking and leadership of communities and individuals working to end the violence in our lives.

    http://www.centerforjudicialexcellence.org/

    CJE – The Center for Judicial Excellence (CJE) was established to improve the judiciary’s public accountability and strengthen and maintain the integrity of the courts. CJE has made a special commitment to protect the rights of children and other vulnerable populations in the courts.

    ##

    KATHLEEN RUSSELL | KATHLEEN RUSSELL CONSULTING

    1346 4th Street | San Rafael, CA | 94901

    Main 415.459.9211 | Fax 415.459.9210

    Telling Stories, Moving Mountains

    www.kathleenrussell.com

    A CERTIFIED BAY AREA GREEN BUSINESS

    Saturday, May 9, 2009

    A Society Illusively Fixated on Fatherhood

    Written by Randi James

    This is in response to Hopes rise for progress on fatherhood woes.

    President Obama is seen as key figure in campaign to promote responsible dads because he has been a target: a target of the idea of "Responsible Fatherhood" that originated in Illinois (and Indiana):

    He is a past co-sponsor of an ambitious fatherhood bill that Democrats Sen. Evan Bayh of Indiana and Rep. Danny Davis of Illinois plan to reintroduce in conjunction with Father's Day. Many of its provisions are aimed at removing barriers that deter noncustodial fathers from providing financial support to their children.

    These men are not well-intentioned. They could give a flying fuck about the needs of Black families, especially women and children. They illustrate Black matriarchal families as the epitome of all of societal ills, citing deceptive research that talks about father absence and sex, incarceration, education, self-esteem, etc. This is crafted in order to continue to subjugate White women...all women.

    The "Responsible Fatherhood" money (Courtesy of the Administration of Children and Families ACF) is supposed to be used to help men improve themselves economically, for the betterment of their children. And many of us support this idea. However, when this money is being used to help fathers gain access to their children via joint custody and custody switching (from mothers), we must question the motives.


    90FR0025
    RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD: CLASSES WITH INCARCERATED FATHERS. CONCURRENT WORK WITH MOTHER/CARETAKER OF CHILD, TO LEARN RESPONSIBILITY
    ACF
    ACF
    $441,387


    How does decreasing or eliminating child support benefit children of poverty?

    How does establishing or maintaining a relationship with a previously/currently violent father benefit children with emotional problems?

    How does alternating custody benefit children with stability and attachment issues?
    And much more...

    The Black communities have a multiplicity of needs that stem from the intersection of the -isms. We are not well-served by simple notions, especially those that are held by people not vested in our best interests.

    "No one objects to responsible fatherhood," said Kim Gandy, president of the National Organization for Women. "What we object to is the use of very limited welfare funds that are needed for the support of children being diverted into job training and other programs for fathers that are not available to the mothers."

    Joshua DuBois, director of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships, said Obama's record on women's rights should help ease any concerns over his interest in fatherhood.

    "The president has been such a solid supporter of women's issues," DuBois said. "They know he's not going to do anything to compromise the position of women in their families, and that trust is key in the search for common ground."


    Interesting. Notice the lack of the use of the word "mother." When does society talk about mothers, only on Mother's Day? Where in the Whitehouse.gov literature are mothers' issues addressed? This is very telling.

    Apparently, women and mothers are indistinguishable--fathers and men are not. If President Obama really wanted to help families, he would establish policies that create stability for children in their current arrangements. Regulating the family through Fatherhood Initiatives is a joke, unless it involves re-framing the negative ideas that many men have about women, mothers, and caretaking.

    Some like to speak about how Black men disrespect their own women in their music lyrics, video, and literature. However, these attitudes do not operate inside of a vacuum--they are reflective of society at large. This pitting Black men against Black women serves the agenda of men like Bayh and Leving. We know we have all this booty shaking and titties in the videos, we're addressing it. But who's doing something about all of these homicides and familicides, mostly committed by White men?

    It is our greatest hope that President Obama is as intelligent as we thought he was when we voted for him. Not all of us want a dog, a two parent male/female household, and a white picket fence. Fatherhood can't even exist, without Motherhood.


    List of Award Numbers, Award Title, OPDIV, Program Officen, and finally Sum of Actions (our tax $$$):

    90FR0093
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 450,000
    90FR0093
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    OFA
    $ 225,000
    90FR0082
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD- PRIORITY AREA #3
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 450,000
    90FR0082
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD- PRIORITY AREA #3
    ACF
    OFA
    $ 225,000
    90FR0079
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 499,104
    90FR0079
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    OFA
    $ 249,552
    90FR0060
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 449,416
    90FR0060
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    OFA
    $ 223,808
    90FR0031
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 2,000,000
    90FR0031
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    OFA
    $ 1,000,000
    90FR0104
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 474,640
    90FR0010
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 652,110
    90FR0008
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD, PRIORITY AREA 3
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 500,000
    90FR0007
    F&CS PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD PROJECT
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 460,000
    90FR0004
    HEALTHY MARRIAGE AND RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD PROJECT
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 956,109
    90FR0103
    HSI RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD LEVEL 1 - A COORDINATED EFFORT TO RECRUIT AND ENROLL FATHERS AND EDUCATE THE COMMUNITY ABOUT
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 1,500,000
    90FR0101
    IDOC APPLICATION FOR THE PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD GRANT FOR THE PREP PROGRAM
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 798,740
    90FR0098
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD COMMUNITY ACCESS PROGRAM
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 1,900,000
    90FR0097
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 922,924
    90FR0095
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 950,000
    90FR0094
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 440,184
    90FR0092
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 694,061
    90FR0091
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 1,450,442
    90FR0088
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD, COMMUNITY ACCESS PROGRAM
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 2,000,000
    90FR0086
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD COMMUNITY ACCESS PROGRAM
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 1,998,000
    90FR0085
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD COMMUNITY ACCESS PROGRAM
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 4,000,000
    90FR0084
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 1,000,000
    90FR0081
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 407,588
    90FR0080
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 462,500
    90FR0077
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 561,660
    90FR0075
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 452,000
    90FR0073
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 870,000
    90FR0072
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 500,000
    90FR0070
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 388,998
    90FR0069
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 486,488
    90FR0068
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 975,000
    90FR0067
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 1,000,000
    90FR0066
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 738,664
    90FR0064
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 310,000
    90FR0063
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 450,000
    90FR0062
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 464,203
    90FR0059
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 852,000
    90FR0058
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 500,000
    90FR0057
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 436,671
    90FR0056
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD, PRIORITY AREA 3
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 465,533
    90FR0055
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 400,000
    90FR0053
    POMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 500,000
    90FR0052
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 350,000
    90FR0050
    PROMORING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 847,712
    90FR0049
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 1,000,000
    90FR0045
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 462,000
    90FR0044
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 824,000
    90FR0043
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 463,999
    90FR0042
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 1,410,000
    90FR0040
    PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE FATHERHOOD
    ACF
    ACF
    $ 500,000
    For more info on fatherhood drivel, see: this, and click on some of the posts categorized below.

    Saturday, April 25, 2009

    Dr. Richard Gardner: "Sex with Children is Not a Bad Thing"


    In 1985, "Paretnal Alienation Syndrome," or PAS for short, was first described by Richard Gardner, a psychiatrist who wrote that adults having sex with children is not a bad thing. Gardner described PAS as a “syndrome” whereby vengeful mothers employed child abuse allegations as a powerful weapon to punish ex-husbands and ensure custody to themselves. He further theorized that such protective parents enlisted the children in their “campaign of denigration” and “vilification” of the abuser, that they often “brainwashed” or “programmed” the children into believing untrue claims of abuse by the father, and that the children then fabricated and contributed their own stories.

    Since 1985, abusers have come to convince family courts to ignore children’s allegations of abuse by invoking parental alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome. They wrongly claim that mothers are to blame because they are brainwashing their children.

    2006 – The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges also discredited the theory. It stated:

    The discredited “diagnosis” of “PAS” (or allegation of “parental alienation”), quite apart from its scientific invalidity, inappropriately asks the court to assume that the children’s behaviors and attitudes toward the parent who claims to be “alienated” have no grounding in reality. It also diverts attention away from the behaviors of the abusive parent, who may have directly influenced the children’s responses by acting in violent, disrespectful, intimidating, humiliating and/or discrediting ways toward the children themselves, or the children’s other parent.


    One of the most troubling consequences of Gardner’s theory is that, “PAS shifts attention away from the perhaps dangerous behaviour of the parent seeking custody to that of the custodial parent. This person, who may be attempting to protect the child, is instead presumed to be lying and poisoning the child.”


    As a result, some children placed in the custody of their abusers have committed suicide; others have run away, and countless others have endured the abuse and are permanently traumatized. In recent years, children placed in custody of their abusers have been coming forward to tell their stories and to warn of the danger surrounding the fictitious syndrome.